NewsBytes January 26, 2024
In this issue:
Support Concurrent Receipt Reform
VA Changing Schedule for Disability Evaluations
HVAC Subcommittee Investigating VA Revolving Funds
Post 9-11 GI Bill Fraud Scheme
Support Concurrent Receipt Reform
The
FRA is advocating for the House to pass the "Major Richard Star Act"
(H.R.1282). This legislation provides concurrent receipt for service
members unable to complete 20 years of service due to combat-related
injuries (H.R.1282, S.344). The House Armed Services Committee
unanimously approved the House version (H.R.1282), sending it to the
House floor for further consideration. Over two-thirds of the House and
Senate are co-sponsoring the "Major Richard Star Act." Please ask your legislators to support this legislation today!
VA Changing Schedule for Disability Evaluations
The
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is undergoing a major overhaul of
its disability ratings criteria and how they evaluate mental health and
other conditions for veterans. VA officials stated that the changes are
being made to help ensure that compensation is in line with veterans’
medical conditions.
The
VA plans to update its Schedule for Rating Disabilities, which is its
guide for determining how it evaluates and provides benefits for
service-connected disabilities. Mental health conditions will now
include the impact on veterans’ lives and abolish the “0%” disability
rating for any service-connected mental health diagnosis in favor of a
10% minimum.
For
tinnitus, the VA will eliminate its stand-alone rating and consider the
condition a symptom of whatever underlying disease is its cause. As for
sleep apnea, ratings will be assessed based on the effectiveness of
treatment and the condition’s impact on “earning impairment.”
The
VA hopes that by changing how they assess conditions, they will ensure
veterans are compensated appropriately. Eventually, veterans with mental
health conditions will likely see higher disability ratings. But fewer
will likely be able to receive compensation for other conditions, such
as tinnitus and sleep apnea. The VA claims that veterans already
receiving compensation for these conditions will not see their ratings
downgraded when the changes are implemented. Veterans who think their
ratings should be upgraded based on the new criteria should file a claim
with the VA.
HVAC Subcommittee Investigating VA Revolving Funds
The
House Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
held an oversight hearing on the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
management of revolving funds. A revolving fund authorizes an agency to
retain and use specified receipts for particular purposes. Revolving
funds are intended to finance cyclical, business-like operations of a
federal agency. These revolving funds are supposed to be
self-supporting. The VA has two large revolving funds—the
Franchise Fund and the Supply Fund—and many other smaller funds. The
enterprises in the Franchise Fund provide accounting, payments, debt
collection, human resources, I.T., law enforcement training, and other
services. The VA publishes the Franchise Fund’s annual report, but the
Supply Fund’s financial statements are not public. It was discovered
that this fund made a $37 million loss last year, but the financial
statements reported it as a profit.
Post 9-11 GI Bill Fraud Scheme
A
resident of Calimesa, California, was sentenced to one year and a day
in prison for his role in defrauding the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) Post 9-11 GI Bill education benefit program. He was a certifying
official at the California Technical Academy, which offered VA-approved
training programs to military veterans. He and his co-conspirators made
false and fraudulent representations to the VA regarding, among other
things, veterans’ enrollment in approved courses of study and class
attendance. The defendant and his co-conspirators also falsified course
completion records to make it appear as if enrolled veterans completed
their programs, when in fact, they had not. For 10 years, the school
fraudulently obtained more than $32 million in tuition payments from the
VA. During the same period, the VA paid more than $72 million in
education-related government benefits to veterans enrolled in
VA-approved courses. In total, the scheme to defraud the VA resulted in a
total loss of nearly $105 million. The defendant was also ordered to
pay $3.4 million in restitution to the VA. This was the Justice
Department’s largest Post-9/11 GI Bill fraud case. The VA Office of
Inspector General investigated this case.